SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 708

ALKA SARIN
Nahida – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. (Oral). - Heard through video conferencing.

2. This is a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to grant protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondent Nos.4 to 8 and not to harass or interfere in the married life of the petitioners at the instance of the private respondents.

3. The facts, as set out in the petition, are that both the petitioners are Muslims and are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1 is 01.01.2002 as per her Aadhar Card (Annexure P-2) and that of petitioner No.2 is 01.01.1997 as per his Aadhar Card (Annexure P-3). It is further alleged that both the petitioners are in love with each other since many years and have performed Nikah on 19.01.2021 as per Nikahnama Annexure P-l. However, the relatives of petitioner No.1 are against the relationship of the petitioners. In para 15 of the petition it is stated "That it is also pertinent to mention before this Hon'ble Court that it is the second marriage of both petitioner earlier forcefully ge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top