SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 682

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. (Oral). Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of the impugned order dated 16.12.2020 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani vide which the petitioner was directed to surrender before the learned Trial Court within 10 days.

2. The petitioner was taken into custody on 06.05.2020 and on the expiry of period of 60 days the petitioner was granted default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C vide Annexure P-2 dated 06.07.2020. Since the challan of the case was not presented, the aforesaid order was passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tosham on the ground that since 60 days have expired the petitioner is entitled to default bail.

3. However, the State of Haryana filed revision against the aforesaid order in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani and vide Annexure P-3 dated 16.12.2020, the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani set aside the aforesaid order with a direction to the accused to surrender before the learned Trial Court within 10 days from the date of the order.

4. The subject matter involved in the present case was that as to whether the petitioner could have been en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top