SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 677

JASWANT SINGH, SANT PARKASH
Vinod Kumar & Others – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajwant Singh Chahal, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Sant Parkash, J. - (The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing as the proceedings are being conducted in virtual court)

2. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing order dated 21.09.2020 (Annexure P-11) passed by respondent No.1, vide which request of petitioners for purchase and proposal of Gram Panchayat, Village Pirthala, for sale of Shamlat Land at market price, under Section 12(4) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Rules, 1964 (for short the Rules') has been rejected.

3. The facts of the case are that in the year 1956 during consolidation under government scheme, some small size plots were carved out from village common land for poor inhabitants of Village Pirthala, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad. The ancestors of the petitioners were allotted 0-8 marla plots, adjoining to Khasra Nos. 426 and 428. In the year 1960, houses were constructed on the said plots. as per the site plan Annexure P/1, there existed a gair mumkin rasta (1 Kanal 4 Marla) in Khasra No. 426 in the revenue record and Khasra No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top