SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 676

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Guddi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J. (Oral). - The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No. 197 dated 30.07.2020 registered under Sections 304-B, 34, 408-A IPC at Police Station Sadar Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri.

3. Petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased Shallu. As per allegations in the FIR, the complainant brother of the deceased alleged that the deceased was married to Sumesh son of the petitioner and dowry was given according to their capacity. In-laws of the deceased started harassing his sister just after two months of the marriage. After 3-4 months of the marriage, the sister of the complainant came to the house and narrated entire story to the complainant family. A meeting was convened with in-laws and they apologized for the same with an assurance not to harass Shallu in future. Shallu was also convinced by the complainant party and she was sent to matrimonial house. Sister-in-law of Shallu is serving in police department and she used to threat the sister of the complainant for bringing dowry. 3-4 days prior to the occurrence, Shallu informed the complainant in resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top