SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 658

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Rinku – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral). - This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.558 dated 16.12.2020 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 506, 120-B of IPC, 1860; Section 3 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'SC/ST Act') (Sections 325 and 120-B of IPC and Section 3 of the SC/ST Act added later on) registered at Police Station Gohana City, District Sonepat, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations in the FIR, complainant Sanjay is running a grocery depot in the village and on account of some previous altercation, there was a dispute between him and co-accused Rajender, however, the matter was settled between them through Panchayat but keeping a grudge, Rajender along with his son Rahul alias Bholu and others came to his shop and caused him injuries with their respective weapons.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner was not named in the FIR, however, his name surfaced on the disclosure statement of one of the co-accused.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that no enmity or mot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top