SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 652

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J.
Roshani & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. - Respondents
CRWP N 10638 of 2020
Decided On : 15-01-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Pushpinder Kaur Minhas, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ashok Singh Chaudhary, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the Respondent.

In cases of matrimonial disputes, the grant of divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 may be a determining factor in the court's decision to provide protection of life and liberty.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Protection of Life and Liberty - Court dismissed the petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners due to lack of divorce granted to petitioner No. 1 under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7. Petitioner No. 1, the wife of respondent No. 4, alleged a matrimonial dispute and sought protection from the abusive behavior of respondent No. 4.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petition as no ground was made out to allow the prayer made in the petition, citing the lack of divorce granted to petitioner No. 1 under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Issues: Matrimonial dispute, protection of life and liberty, divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the precedent set by the Allahabad High Court, which held that in cases where any of the petitioners has not obtained divorce from his/her spouse, no protection can be granted.

Final Decision: The present petition was dismissed due to the lack of divorce granted to petitioner No. 1 under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. (Oral). - Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

1. This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7.

2. Status report by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kalayat, District Kaithal, filed in the Registry, is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioner No. 1 is the wife of respondent No. 4 and they have a child, who has been residing with respondent No. 4. She further submits that there is a matrimonial dispute between the husband and wife. Respondent No. 4 is a drunkard and used to beat his wife-petitioner No. 1 and also extended threats to kill her. Petitioner No. 1 also filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against respondent No. 4. She further submits that both the petitioners are known to each other since long and have been living together in live-in relationship and facing threat from respondents No. 4 to 7. In this regard, the petitioners have also moved a representation dated 01.12.2020(Annexure P-3) to Superintendent of Police, Kaithal-respondent No. 2 but no action has been taken on the same so far.

4. On the other hand, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer made by the petitioners.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

6. A Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in the case titled as Akhlesh and another Vs. State of U.P. and others decided on 25.02.2020 and a Single Bench of Allahabad High Court in the case titled as Kusum and another Vs. State of U.P. and others decided on 09.11.2016, held that in the cases where any of the petitioners, has not obtained divorce from his/her spouse, no protection can be granted.

7. In this case, though as per petitioner No. 1, she has filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, yet no divorce has been granted so far.

8. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed, as no ground is made out to allow the prayer made in the petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top