ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral) - CRM No. 31214 of 2020
Prayer in this application is for early hearing of the main petition.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the main case, which is fixed for 05.03.2021, is taken up today for hearing.
CRM No. 31209 of 2020
Heard.
Allowed as prayed for.
Documents (Annexures P-22 to P-26) are taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
CRM-M No. 40506 of 2019 (O&M)
A murdered man was found alive. Still the 15 years long agony of the petitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') is not buried by the Courts below.
2. This is the state of affairs that despite the National Judicial Academy as well as the Chandigarh Judicial Academy, holding seminars and imparting training to the Sessions Judges or the Magistrates, that judicial consciousness demand real and substantive justice and there is nothing illegal in the judicial system if in exceptional case, a Court, in quest of truth and justice passes an order acknowledging the constitutional right of a citizen, the Additional Sessions Judge,-I, Ludhiana and Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana, have failed to exercise jurisdiction vested with them.
3. T
Adalat Prasad vs. Rooplal Jindal
Meghmala and others vs. G. Narasimha Reddy and others, 2010 SCC (10) 383
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs. Jagannath
State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Padhi
Sube Singh vs. State of Haryana, 2006(1) RCR(Cri) 802
Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Vikram Johar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2019 (14) SCC 207
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.