SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.
Gram Panchayat Village Chandrawali & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. - Respondents
CWP-21286-2020
Decided On : 11-01-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the Respondent

The main legal point established in the judgment is the government's supervising authority over Gram Panchayats' resolutions and the need for government approval before executing development works.

Headnote:

Gram Panchayats - Development Works - Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - [Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994] - The court discussed the provisions of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, emphasizing the government's supervising authority over resolutions passed by Gram Panchayats and the need for government approval before execution of development works. The court highlighted the Constitutional Right of Gram Panchayats to administer themselves and questioned the imposition of a complete ban on using funds from fixed deposits, especially when the urgency and requirement of a particular Gram Panchayat were not considered.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, Gram Panchayats, challenged the State's order imposing a ban on executing development works using funds from fixed deposits. The State justified the order citing complaints of financial irregularities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the government is the supervising authority over Gram Panchayats' resolutions and emphasized the need for government approval before executing development works. The court questioned the imposition of a complete ban on using funds from fixed deposits and highlighted the Constitutional Right of Gram Panchayats to administer themselves.

Issues: The issues revolved around the State's authority to impose a ban on using funds from fixed deposits for development works and the Constitutional Right of Gram Panchayats to administer themselves.

Ratio Decidendi: The government's supervising authority over Gram Panchayats' resolutions and the need for government approval before executing development works were key legal principles influencing the court's decision.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of as the petitioners' grievance was redressed, and the respondents were bound by the statement made by the State counsel.

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral). - In the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners-Gram Panchayats is that the State has passed an order on 19.11.2020 (Annexure P-1) wherein a complete ban has been imposed for executing the development works by spending the amount, lying in the fixed deposit of the Gram Panchayats. This Court had issued notice of motion on 10.12.2020, which is as follows :-

"Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that once the Gram Panchayats are independent bodies to take their own decisions with respect to the development and also has full authority to use the funds for undertaking development work required to be executed for the benefit of the residents of the Gram Panchayat, the order passed by the respondent-State restraining the Gram Panchayat from using their own fund lying as fixed deposit in the Banks, is arbitrary and illegal.

Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the blanket order cannot be passed by the respondent-State restraining the Gram Panchayats from using the amount lying in fixed deposit for the reason that as and when any development work is undertaken by a particular Gram Panchayat by passing a resolution, the State as supervising authority assess the same as to whether the said resolution is in the interest of the Gram Panchayat or not and has jurisdiction to pass appropriate orders examining the resolution as and when presented before the Government.

Notice of motion for 04.01.2021.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings through video conference, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks time to file reply.

Let the reply be filed positively by the next date of hearing as the petitioner Gram Panchayat is feeling prejudiced to the impugned order.

Prayer of the petitioner for the grant of interim order will be examined on the next date of hearing. "

2. When the case was taken up for consideration on 04.01.2021, the following order was passed :-

"Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents-State submits that out of six gram panchayats, who have filed the present writ petition i.e. petitioners No.1 to 3 and 6, have already been merged in the Municipal Corporation, Faridabad and no longer exists as of now keeping in view the notification dated 30.12.2020, hence, the present writ petition qua those gram panchayats has been rendered infructuous.

Learned State counsel further submits that with regard to grievance of petitioners No.4 and 5 qua the notification dated 19.11.2020 (Annexure P-l), last opportunity be granted to file the reply.

Learned State counsel undertakes to file the reply by 08.01.2021 positively and the grievance of petitioners in respect of the notification dated 19.12.2020 (P-l) will be considered on merits on the next date of hearing.

Adjourned to 11.01.2021."

3. Today the reply has been submitted by the respondents-State wherein, the plea taken by the State for justification of issuing the order dated 19.11.2020 (Annexure P-l) has been given to the effect that there were certain complaints received by the authorities in respect of some Gram Panchayats about financial irregularities.

4. It is conceded by the learned counsel(s) appearing on behalf of the respective parties that keeping in view the provisions of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, the Government is still the supervising authority in respect of any resolution passed by the Gram Panchayats and any resolution which is passed by the Gram Panchayat, goes for the scrutiny/approval of the Government before the said resolution is implemented. That being so, a resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat for executing the development work, has to be approved by the Government before the execution of the proposed development work.

5. Once, a resolution passed by a Gram Panchayat is implemented after the Government approves that the resolution so passed by the Gram Panchayat regarding execution o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top