SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 603

ALKA SARIN
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Neha Dewan, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. (Oral). - The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.159 dated 10.08.2020 under Sections 380 and 457 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Rajound, District Kaithal.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of the CCTV Footage.

3. Referring to the still photographs taken from the CCTV Footage which have been appended as Annexure P-4, the learned counsel would further contend that the person seen in the said footage had a muffled face and there is no way that the person could be identified as being the petitioner. The learned counsel further contends that there is nothing more to be recovered from the petitioner since as per the case set up by the prosecution an alleged recovery of Rs. 1,68,000/- has already been made from the petitioner. It is further contended that petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2020 and challan has already been presented and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer.

4. Learned State counsel has referred to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top