SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 619

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Avneesh Jhingan, J.
Gurnam Singh @ Gami - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M-130-2021
Decided On : 11-01-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Divjyot S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner; Ms. Samina Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

The court considered the circumstances, including the marginally beyond commercial limit recovery, in granting bail to the petitioner.

Headnote:

Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Regular Bail - Recovery of Poppy Husk - Marginally Above Commercial Quantity

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving the recovery of 55 kgs of poppy husk, marginally above the commercial quantity, under Section 15 of NDPS Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the circumstances, including the petitioner not being apprehended at the spot, the time it would take for trial conclusion, and the marginally beyond commercial limit recovery, and granted the bail.

Issues: The issues involved the recovery of poppy husk, the petitioner's apprehension, and the opposition to bail based on involvement in another case under NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of apprehension at the spot, the time required for trial conclusion, and the marginally beyond commercial limit recovery.

Final Decision: The petitioner was granted bail upon furnishing surety/bail bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate, with a clarification that the decision does not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

JUDGMENT

Avneesh Jhingan, J (Oral) - The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

2. This is a petition for regular bail in case of FIR No. 159, dated 13th August, 2020, under Section 15 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) registered at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on the basis of secret information checking was done at Dholewal Bridge Chowk Dharamkot and 55 kgs of poppy husk was recovered. There were two accused. Gurpreet Singh @ Peeta was apprehended whereas Gurnam Singh @ Garni (petitioner) succeeded in fleeing from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot and recovery of 55 kgs of poppy husk is marginally above the commercial quantity. Petitioner is in custody and the challan has yet not been presented. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is involved in another case i.e. FIR No. 18, dated 6th September, 2018, under Section 15 of NDPS Act and she opposes the grant of bail.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the said case, recovery was of non-commercial quantity and petitioner is on bail.

6. Considering the facts; that no recovery is to be effected; petitioner was not apprehended from the spot; conclusion of trial would take time and recovery is marginally beyond commercial limit, present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing surety/bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

7. However, it is clarified that anything stated hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and is only for the purpose of deciding the bail application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top