SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 619

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Gurnam Singh @ Gami – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Divjyot S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner; Ms. Samina Dhir, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Avneesh Jhingan, J (Oral) - The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

2. This is a petition for regular bail in case of FIR No. 159, dated 13th August, 2020, under Section 15 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) registered at Police Station Dharamkot, District Moga.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on the basis of secret information checking was done at Dholewal Bridge Chowk Dharamkot and 55 kgs of poppy husk was recovered. There were two accused. Gurpreet Singh @ Peeta was apprehended whereas Gurnam Singh @ Garni (petitioner) succeeded in fleeing from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot and recovery of 55 kgs of poppy husk is marginally above the commercial quantity. Petitioner is in custody and the challan has yet not been presented. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is involved in another case i.e. FIR No. 18, dated 6th September, 2018, under Section 15 of NDPS Act and she opposes the grant of bail.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the said case, recovery was of non-commercial quantity and petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top