ANOOP CHITKARA
Surmukh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 20 | 03.04.2011 | Phool, District Bathinda | 452, 325, 323, 427, 457, 380, 148, 149 of IPC 1860 |
The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings along with judgment/order of sentence dated 29.08.2019 (Annexure-P2) based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioner(s) is that the complainant-respondent No.2 has made statement before the police and on that statement police registered the FIR captioned above. After trial, all the petitioner stands convicted vide judgment dated 29.08.2019 passed by JMIC, Phul. Needless to mention all the details as the parties have compromised the matter.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the victim(s) have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition. After that, the petitioner(s) came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.