ANOOP CHITKARA
Mahinder Kumar @ Tinki – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 65 | 23.07.2019 | Bassi Pathana, District Fatehgarh Sahib | 379-B, 341, 323, 147 & 149 IPC |
The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioner(s) is that the complainant (respondent No.2) made a statement before the police and on that statement, the police registered the FIR captioned above. Needless to mention all the details as the parties have entered into an out of Court compromise.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the victim(s) have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition. After that, the petitioner(s) came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the victim(s) have been impleaded as respondent(s).
4. On the prayer of the parties in the present petition, the Court had permitted the parties to appear b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.