ANOOP CHITKARA
Naval Kaur @ Komal Preet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
1. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 267 21.10.2021 City, District Sri Muktsar 279 & 337 IPC Sahib The petitioner, arraigned as an accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioner is that the complainant (respondent No.2) made a complaint to the police that his nephew was met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving of the petitioner in a public way. The private respondent(s) suffered injuries leading to the registration of FIR captioned above.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2. After that, the petitioner has come up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the injured have been impleaded as respondent(s).
4. On the prayer of the parties in the present petition, the Court had permitted the parties to appear before the concerned Court to record their statements. As per the concerned Court's report, the victi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.