ANOOP CHITKARA
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 582 | 29.10.2014 | Hodal, District Palwal | 148, 149, 323, 324, 285 & 506 IPC and Section 25/54/59 of Arms Act |
1. The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioner(s) is that the complainant (respondent No.2) made a statement before the police and based on that statement, the police registered the FIR captioned above. Needless to mention all the details and it is sufficient to say that the parties have entered into a compromise.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition. After that, the petitioner(s) came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the injured/complainant have been implead
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.