ANOOP CHITKARA
Mandeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 229 | 25.06.2020 | Sadar Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran | 326, 323, 506 & 34 IPC |
The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. Based on the allegations leveled by the complainant-respondent No.2, the police registered the FIR as mentioned above. Needless to refer to the allegations in detail because the matter has been compromised.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3. After that, the petitioner(s) came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the injured have been impleaded as respondent(s).
4. On the prayer of the parties in the present petition, the Court had permitted the parties to appear before the concerned Court to record their statements. As per the concerned Court's repo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.