SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 383

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Neelam Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

Gurvinder SINGH GILL, J. (Oral). - The petitioners have approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR No.165, dated 29.6.2021, Police Station Model Town, District Hoshiarpur, under Section 306 IPC (Annexure P-l) on the basis of compromise.

2. Today at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that apart from the grounds of compromise, he may also be permitted to canvas his grounds for quashing of FIR on merits as well.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. A perusal of the FIR would show that the same was lodged by father of the deceased Avtar Chand. It is alleged that Avtar Chand was married to Neelam Devi (petitioner No.1) about 14 years back. It is further alleged that about 2 months back, differences had cropped up between Avtar Chand and his wife Neelam Devi because she used to unnecessarily doubt that Avtar Chand was having illicit relations with some lady on account of which they often used to quarrel. It is further alleged that Neelam Devi also used to provoke her parents, sister and brother-in-law upon which her father Pakhar Singh, mother Satya Devi had visited their house several times and instead of pacifying the matter, they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top