JUDGMENT

Sudhir Mittal, J. (Oral) -This judgment will dispose of Civil Writ Petitions No. 2293, 2315 and 4003 of 2015 as the facts involved therein are identical and the orders impugned are also the same.

2. The facts are not in dispute.Harjinder Kaur executed three separate registered sale deeds in favour of the petitioners on 18.08.2006 in respect of three separate parcels of land. Based thereupon, the petitioners applied for entry of mutation and mutation dated 31.08.2006 was entered. This was challenged by respondents No. 2 and 3 by way of appeal and the appeal was allowed vide order dated 30.01.2007 on the ground that the sale had been executed in violation of an order of status quo dated 06.08.2003 passed by the civil Court in a suit for declaration filed by the brothers-in-law of the vendor that property subject matter thereof was joint hindu family property. Revision preferred by the petitioners was dismissed vide order dated 17.09.2008 and second revision was dismissed vide order dated 13.08.2013. The petitioners sought review of the order dated 13.08.2013 on the basis of an order dated 09.12.2011 passed by the civil Court whereby the civil suit referred to earlier had been