JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - Seeking fair and impartial investigation, the petitioner, claiming to be an aggrieved person, has come up before this court seeking the issuance of appropriate directions.

2. Notices are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of notices to the private respondents is required.

3. Let the petitioner make his representation to the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police/ Commissioner of Police, within two weeks from today. If the petitioner files a representation with in the above-mentioned time period of two weeks, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police/ Commissioner of Police, within two months, either himself/herself or by authorizing and delegating it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representationists without delay.

4. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file fresh petition or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

5. It is clarified that there is n