JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to decide the representation dated 01.12.2022 (Anneuxre P-3).

2. Notices are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of notices to the private respondents is required.

3. Let the representation dated 01.12.2022, Annexure P-3 be decided by the concerned Superintendent of Police, within three days. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representationists without delay. In case, the concerned SP wants to dismiss the representation, it must be supported by valid and speaking reasons.

4. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file fresh petition or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

5. It is clarified that there is no adjudication on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioner is required in any cognizable case.

6. There would be no need for a certified copy of this order, and any Advocate for th