SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Kapil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. The petitioners seek relief for the quashing of Annexure P-1 and P-4, wherein becomes enclosed, the notifications issued respectively under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1894’). The petitioners have also asked for the quashing of the award (Annexure P-5) and of the supplementary award (Annexure P-9), besides have sought the quashing of the entire acquisition proceedings, inasmuch as, they relate to the petition lands.
2. The last relief, as asked for in the instant petition, is for making a mandamus upon the respondents concerned, to consider, and, to take a decision on Annexure P-8, annexure whereof comprises a representation seeking for release of the petitions lands from acquisition, thus in terms of a policy (Annexure P-7).
3. The predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners had earlier challenged the launching of the acquisition proceedings, in respect of the petition lands, at the instance of the respondents concerned. The said challenge was embodied in CWP-8439-2013. However, through a verdict made thereon, on 11.12.2015, and, which becomes enclosed in Annexure P-6, the said challenge b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.