SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 589

HARKESH MANUJA
Inderjeet Kaur @ Shindi – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Balbir Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for the State

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. - By way of present petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner is seeking grant of regular bail pending trial in FIR No.109 dated 02.07.2021 under Sections 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Nihal Singh Wala, District Moga (Annexure P-1).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, Investigation has already been concluded and challan stands filed way back on 23.11.2021 but even till date out of 12 prosecution witnesses, none has been examined so far. Charges were framed on 15.12.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that from a perusal of the challan one can make out that there is blatant non compliance of Section 42 of the NDPS Act. He also submits that though at the time of effecting alleged recovery, the police officials were in a private vehicle as described in the challan itself, however, no details of the said vehicle such as, chassis number, type, name of driver etc. have been disclosed/mentioned in the challan which runs contrary to the guidelines dated 27.04.2015 issued by the office of Director General of Police, Punjab, Chandigarh. Learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top