MANOJ BAJAJ
Karan Bhasin – Appellant
Versus
Piyush – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral) - CM-5121-C-2022 and CM-5122-C-2022
1. These applications have been filed by applicant/appellant under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for stay of the execution of the impugned decree dated 14.12.2018 passed by appellate Court. The other application has been filed under Section 151 CPC for preponing the date of hearing in the main appeal, which is fixed for hearing on 10.01.2023.
2. Learned counsel has submitted that the appellate Court has erroneously reversed the decree passed by the trial Court, and decreed the suit of the plaintiffs by ignoring the material evidence and though the notice of motion has been issued by this Court in this appeal, but the same is not taken up for hearing and on the other hand, the executing Court is proceeding with the execution. In this regard, he has produced the copy of the order dated 26.07.2022 passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Kurukshetra, whereby warrants of arrest against judgment debtors have been issued for non-execution of decree. He prays that the execution proceedings be stayed and the date of hearing in the main appeal be also preponed.
3. Notice in the applications.
4. At this stage, Mr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.