JUDGMENT

Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral) - Petitioners (tenants) have filed this revision petition to challenge the judgment dated 30.09.2022 passed in Rent Appeal No.76 of 2016 by the Appellate Authority, Hisar, whereby the judgment of eviction dated 09.02.2016 passed in Rent Petition No.12/2014 by the Rent Controller, Hisar was upheld.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the eviction petition by respondent (landlord) was founded upon three grounds: (i) Nonpayment of rent @ Rs.330/- p.m. w.e.f. 01.09.2013; (ii) the tenanted premises is required by landlord & his wife for personal use and occupation, who intend to start business of kiryana store & (iii) the demised premises, being in dilapidated condition, is unfit and unsafe for human habitation.

3. Learned counsel submits that the eviction petition survived only on the ground Nos.2 and 3, as arrears of rent stood tendered to the landlord before Rent Controller. He further submits that the finding on ground No.3 relating to the condition of the demised premises has been delivered against the landlord, but eviction of tenant has been ordered by accepting the ground that the property is required by landlord for personal use a