SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1793

HARKESH MANUJA
Dani Devi – Appellant
Versus
Pritam Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Satbir Gill, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Amarjit Beniwal, Advocate, for Mr. Harish Nain, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. - By way of present appeal, the appellants have questioned the adequacy of compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jind, for short 'the Tribunal', vide its award dated 03.04.2012.

2. The facts, in brief, are that on 23.06.2011 the deceased (Hawa Singh) was going to his Village Jajanwala from Village Prabhuwala on bicycle, followed by his son Balwinder Singh on a separate bicycle. When the deceased reached near Gupta Brick Kiln, a jeep bearing registration No.HR-31-A-0426 being driven by respondent No.1 in a rash and negligent manner came from behind and struck the bicycle of deceased. As a result thereof, Hawa Singh fell down and suffered multiple grievous injuries. The deceased was shifted to General Hospital, Narwana, but he succumbed to the injuries on the way.

3. On account of the death of Hawa Singh, his dependents filed claim petition before the learned Tribunal. Learned Tribunal allowed the same and assessed the annual income of the deceased as Rs.21,600/- and after applying the multiplier of 10, calculated the total d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top