NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. Instant revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners/defendants under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 09.10.2018 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mansa, whereby application filed by the petitioners/defendants seeking direction to the respondent/plaintiff to give his specimen handwriting and signatures for comparison purpose, which were to be got compared from the handwriting expert engaged by the defendants, has been dismissed.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,09,008/- (Rs.1,61,700/- as principal amount and Rs.48,008/- as interest) along with pendente lite and future interest @ 12% per annum from the appellants/defendants till its realisation. Petitioners/defendants contested the suit and during the stage of evidence, petitioners filed an application for summoning the handwriting expert for proving the handwriting of the respondent/plaintiff on the note given to the petitioners/defendants by the respondent/plaintiff at Bareilly. Thereafter petitioner/defendant filed another application on 18.09.2018 for taking specimen s