ANIL KSHETARPAL
Amita Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sankta Parsad Tiwari – Respondent
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
1. The correctness of the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below are challenged in this appeal by the defendants. The plaintiff’s suit for grant of decree of possession of the plot has been decreed. While filing the suit, the plaintiff claimed the possession of the plot with the following demarcation and description of the property with reference to the property of owners located on four directions:-
| “East: | Gali 18’ wide | side 37’- 6” |
| West: | Land of others, now house of Sanjeev |
|
| North: | Gali Sare Aam 16’ wide | side 30’- 0” |
| South: | Land of Indraj Singh Singh etc now house of Bijender |
side 30’- 0” |
2. The plaintiff claims that he has purchased 125 square yards of land from Indraj Singh son of Sh. Pirthi Singh, who was admittedly the owner of the property. The defendant contested the suit while stating that the same Sh. Indraj Singh had sold the property measuring 130 square yards in favour of Smt. Bala Rani vide sale deed dated 03.12.1999. Thereafter, the aforesaid Smt. Ba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.