SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Daya @ Dayawanti - Appellant(s) - Appellant
Versus
Arjun and others - Respondents - Respondent
FAO-3236 of 2007
Decided On : 17-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bhisham K. Majoka, Advocate the appellant(s).
Mr. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.3 – Insurance Company.

The court emphasized the assessment of the deceased's income, the deduction for personal expenses, and the impact of the deceased's death on the widow in determining the compensation.

Headnote:

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - Compensation Enhancement - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166, Section 140 - Smt. Daya alias Dayawanti v. Ld. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Karnal - Section 166, Section 140

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, widow of the deceased, sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the Ld. Tribunal for the death of her husband in a motor vehicular accident. The Ld. Tribunal had awarded Rs.3,79,000, and the appellant sought enhancement based on the deceased's monthly income, personal expenses deduction, and loss of estate.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the deceased's income should have been assessed according to prevailing wages, and the deduction for personal expenses should be 1/3rd of the income. The court also considered the widow's responsibilities as a homemaker and the impact of the deceased's death on her. The court maintained the rate of interest at 7.5% per annum and enhanced the total compensation to Rs.8,44,508 along with interest.

Issues: The issues involved the assessment of the deceased's income, deduction for personal expenses, and the impact of the deceased's death on the widow.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles from relevant judgments to determine the deceased's income and the deduction for personal expenses. It also considered the widow's responsibilities as a homemaker and the impact of the deceased's death on her.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the total compensation was enhanced to Rs.8,44,508 along with interest at 7.5% per annum.

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/petitioner/claimant (hereinafter referred as ‘claimant’) in MACT Case No. 62 of 2005, dated 19.04.2005, for modification of award dated 28.02.2007, passed by Ld. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Karnal (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. Tribunal’) by way of seeking enhancement of amount of compensation, on account of death of deceased - Sarwan Kumar.

2. There was only one claimant in the MACT case that is Smt. Daya alias Dayawanti, who is widow of the deceased – Sarwan Kumar. In the present appeal before this Court, she is seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by Ld. Tribunal on account of death of her husband Sarwan Kumar in a motor vehicular accident.

3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that on 10.01.2005, at 05:00 p.m., deceased left for Delhi in his truck bearing No. HR-38-BG-5027 from Punjab. Near brick kiln of village Sambli on Dhand to Karnal Road, at about 09:00 p.m., one canter bearing registration No. HR-64-0903 coming on the left side of the road dashed into the truck of the deceased. Sarwan Kumar died on the spot. It was contended that the said canter was being driven in a rash and negligent manner.

4. Claimant filed a claim petition under Section 166 and Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for seeking compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- on account of death of her husband in the motor vehicular accident. However, after going through the record, appreciating the evidences, examining the witnesses and hearing the arguments of both the sides, Ld. Tribunal assessed the age of the deceased as 49 years and 8 months, his monthly income as Rs.3,500/-, deducted 1/3rd on account of his personal expenses, applied the multiplier of 13, granted Rs.5,000/- as spousal consortium, Rs.10,000/- as funeral expenses and accordingly, awarded total compensation to the claimant to the tune of Rs.3,79,000/- payable by respondents severally and jointly with interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till its actual realization.

Appellant/Petitioner/Claimant has filed the present petition, seeking enhancement of the compensation as awarded by the Ld. Tribunal.

5. While addressing arguments, Counsel for the appellants submits that the Ld. Tribunal has erred in determining the monthly salary of the deceased - Sarwan Kumar; failed to enhance the income on account of future prospects; has deducted personal expenses on the higher side and failed to grant any compensation on account of loss of estate.

6. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for Respondent No.3 – Insurance Company, submits that the Ld. Tribunal has rightly determined the monthly salary of the deceased as per prevailing wages of labourers at the time of accident and there is no need to interfere in the amount of compensation awarded by the Ld. Tribunal.

7. This Court is of the view that income of the deceased who was a truck driver should have been assessed in accordance with the DC rates prevalent at the time of the accident which were Rs. 5,812.75/- per month as on date of accident i.e. 10.01.2005.

8. Learned counsel for the appellant/claimant vehemently argues that in view of the law laid by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Smt. Sarla Verma and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another, 2009(3) RCR (Civil) 77 : Law Finder Doc ID #188882 , there being only one dependent of the deceased that is widow of the deceased, a deduction of half (1/2) on account of personal expenses of the deceased should be made. This court has thoroughly examined the verdict of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the aforementioned 'Sarla Verma' case (supra) and observes that there is no explicit indication regarding the deduction to be applied in instances where the deceased was married and has only one dependent. Thus, in such circumstances, it is the discretion of the court to apply the deduction according to the peculiar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top