Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
VIKAS BAHL
Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Magistrate-cum-Appellate Tribunal, Panipat – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
VIKAS BAHL, J.
1. Challenge in the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 06.07.2023 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No.1, vide which eviction order from the residential house in question has been passed against the petitioners.
2. Sole argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioners is that since the petitioners do not have any other house, thus, the impugned order dated 06.07.2023 (P-5) be set aside and the petitioners be permitted to reside in the said house in question.
3. This Court has heard learned counsel for the petitioners and has gone through the paper-book.
4. Respondent No.5-Darshna Devi, who is a widow of 70 years of age and is the mother of the petitioners, had filed an application under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 for directing the eviction of the petitioners from the house in question a
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to order eviction if necessary and expe....
The Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 provide protection to senior citizens from ill-treatment and non-maintenance by their ch....
The Senior Citizens Act empowers senior citizens to seek eviction for their protection, even if there are ongoing civil proceedings regarding property ownership.
The Senior Citizens Act empowers the Tribunal to issue eviction orders to protect the rights and welfare of senior citizens, emphasizing the obligation of children to maintain their parents, includin....
The Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 has the authority to order eviction to enforce maintenance rights of senior citizens.
An eviction order under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act requires a maintenance claim by the senior citizen; without such a claim, the eviction is not maintainable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Tribunal under the 2007 Act to pass an order of eviction to ensure the maintenance and protection of senior citizens, as empha....
The main legal point established is the court's reliance on the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, to protect the well-being of senior citizens and uphold eviction orde....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article