SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 806

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Sukhwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Inderpreet Singh Cooner, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Khullar, AAG, Punjab.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.

1. The instant revision petition has been filed to impugn the order dated 15.02.2022 vide which the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala dismissed an application filed under Section 216 of the Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for discharging him of the charges framed against him under Sections 394/307/326/379/411/34 of the IPC in case arising out of the FIR No.30 dated 30.04.2021 under Sections 307, 394, 511, 34, 379 and 326 of the IPC registered at Police Station Kheri Gandian, District Patiala.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that false implication of the petitioner in the case in hand is evident from the fact that the FIR in question was registered against unknown persons and there was no cogent evidence collected by the investigating agency to link him with the crime in question. While drawing the attention of this Court to the FIR which has been annexed as Annexure P-1, learned counsel has submitted that allegedly on 23.04.2021, three unknown persons came on a motorcycle to the shop of the complainant and attempted to snatch a bag from him which had cash inside it. However, when the complainant resisted, a fist fight broke out betw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top