SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. Status report on affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 by the learned State counsel, and, the same is taken on record.
2. The petitioner has alleged in the petition, that an encroachment, upon, a recorded Gair Mumkin Rasta has been made by one Amolakh Singh, and, by one Jaspal Singh. Even a complaint in the above regard was made to the Competent Authority, whereafter as revealed in paragraph 6 of the reply, on affidavit, furnished to the instant petition, by the respondent-State, an enquiry was conducted by the BDPO Phillaur, for determining the factum of encroachment, if any, as made on the Gair Mumkin Rasta. However, if the enquiry report became founded upon a valid demarcation becoming conducted of the relevant site by the Competent Revenue Officer, thereupon alone it may have some validity.
3. In that regard it it is not clear from a reading of the reply, on affidavit, that in the BDPO Phillaur making a report about the alleged fact, he had depended, upon, a valid demarcation made of the relevant site, rather by the empowered Revenue Officer concerned.
4. In consequence, the decision taken on the complaint by the Competent Authority, is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.