JUDGMENT :

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

By filing the instant revision-petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-defendant No.1 (here-in-after to be referred as ‘defendant No.1) has assailed the order (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala (for short ‘the trial Court) on 23.11.2023 in Civil Suit No.1991 of 2018 titled as ‘Rakesh Kumar and ors Vs. Mohkam Singh etc’, whereby the application Annexure P-13, as moved by respondents No.1 and 2-plaintiffs (here-in-after to be referred as ‘the plaintiffs) for seeking the appointment of the Local Commissioner, has been allowed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner-defendant No.1 in the present revision-petition, at the preliminary stage and have also gone through the file carefully.

3. Learned counsel for defendant No.1 has contended that it is entirely for the plaintiffs to lead cogent and trustworthy evidence on the record so as to substantiate their claim in the above-referred Civil Suit and the Court cannot facilitate the collection of evidence for them (plaintiffs), by way of appointing the Local Commissioner and in these circumstances, it becomes explicit that the impu