SURESHWAR THAKUR, LALIT BATRA
Shri Bhagwan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
1. Since both the writ petition(s) arise from common thereto notification(s) issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter for short called as the 'Act of 1894'), besides also arise from common thereto declaration(s) issued under Section 6 of the 'Act of 1894'. Therefore, both the writ petition(s) are amenable for becoming decided through a common verdict.
2. The said notification(s) became respectively issued on 11.04.2002 and on 08.04.2003.
3. Through the instant writ petition(s), the petitioner(s) herein ask for a mandamus being made upon the respondents concerned to make a notification for thereby de-notifying the petition lands from acquisition.
4. The above asked for mandamus is premised upon the provisions embodied in Section 101 A of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter for short refer to as the 'Act of 2013'), as became incorporated in the ‘Act of 2013', through Haryana Act No. 21 of 2018.”
5. However, for the reasons to be assigned hereinafter, the said asked for mandamus cannot be made upon the respondents concerned.
6. Principally for t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.