Back
GURBIR SINGH
... – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitions and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for anticipatory bail by petitioners (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning for granting bail (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditions for granting anticipatory bail (Para 13) |
| 5. conclusion and final disposition of petitions (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
Judgment
Mr. Gurbir Singh, J.
Vide this common order, two petitions i.e. CRM-M-10868-2023 and CRM-M-20326-2023 filed by two different persons, shall be disposed of as the FIR involved in both the petitions is the same, arising out of the same occurrence.
2. Prayer in both the afore-stated petitions, filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.103 dated 19.07.2022, under Sections 67 , 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as – the Act), registered at Police Station Division No.3, Ludhiana.
3. The FIR in question was registered at the instance of one Yashika Sachdeva against her husband (sic) (petitioner in CRM-M-10868-2023) and (sic) (petitioner in CRM-M-20326-2023).
4. As per the allegations, on 11.05.2022, the complainant received calls and messages on her mobile phone. Wh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
