Back
H. S. MADAAN
Suraj Bans Singh (since deceased) through LRs – Appellant
Versus
Pritpal Singh (since deceased) through LRs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim of joint ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants challenging plaintiff's claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. overview of prior court decisions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. preferential right under section 22. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. limitation period for suit filing. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. nature of possession post-sale. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. affirmation of trial court's findings. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 8. dismissal of appeal with costs. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
Judgment
Mr. H.S. Madaan, J.
Briefly stated, facts of the case are that plaintiff Suraj Bans Singh son of Amolak Singh, resident of WC-134, Opposite Civil Hospital, GT Road, Jalandhar (since dead) represented by his LRs had brought a suit against Pritpal Singh and others, seeking a declaration that plaintiff is joint owner and in joint possession to the extent of 5/9 share in the suit property bearing WC 134 situated at GT Road Opposite Civil Hospital, Jalandhar and sale deed dated 3.12.1999 registered on 10.12.1999 executed by defendant No.2 to 8 in favour of defendant No.1 in respect of specific portion measuring 3 marlas in the house in question is illegal, null and void not binding upon rights of the plaintiff and by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
