Back
SANJIV BERRY
Anjali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for bail under section 439 cpc (Para 1) |
| 2. argument of false implication and innocence (Para 2) |
| 3. opposition based on involvement in cybercrimes (Para 4) |
| 4. consideration of custody duration and recovery (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. granting bail with conditions (Para 7) |
| 6. court's stance on case merits (Para 8) |
Judgment
Mr. Sanjiv Berry, J.
The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.9 dated 01.02.2023 under Sections 419 , 420, and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1).
2. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submitted that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner, a lady aged about 27 years. He submitted that as per the prosecution version the name of the petitioner was disclosed by accused Amit Kumar in his disclosure statement dated 19.02.2023 whereas strangely the notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was issued on 18.02.2023 to the mother of petitioner which is prior even to alleged disclosure statement of accused Amit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
