SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1760

SANJIV BERRY
Anjali – Appellant
Versus
State of U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Harish Kumar Bhatti, Mr. Ashu Mohan Punchhi P.P., U.T., Chandigarh

Judgment

Mr. Sanjiv Berry, J.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.9 dated 01.02.2023 under Sections 419 , 420, and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1).

2. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submitted that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner, a lady aged about 27 years. He submitted that as per the prosecution version the name of the petitioner was disclosed by accused Amit Kumar in his disclosure statement dated 19.02.2023 whereas strangely the notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was issued on 18.02.2023 to the mother of petitioner which is prior even to alleged disclosure statement of accused Amit Kumar dated 19.02.2023. He submitted that the main accused Amit Kumar has since been granted bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh on the basis of compromise dated 24.04.2023 effected between the complainant and the accused including the present petitioner in the present FIR wherein the offences are compo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top