SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1709

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Vikas Lochab

Table of Content
1. mandamus for election nomination rejection. (Para 1 , 2)
2. eligibility criteria for panchayat candidates. (Para 3 , 4)
3. maintainability of writ petition in election matters. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. constitutional bar against election interference. (Para 9 , 10)
5. interpreting disqualification under section 175. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. disqualification not applicable to relatives. (Para 20)
7. petition dismissed due to lack of grounds. (Para 21 , 22)

Judgment

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

The petitioner has filed the instant petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to reject the nomination papers of respondent No.7-Poonam Devi in view of instructions issued for Panchayat Election (Annexure P-1), on the ground that she is not eligible for contesting the election for the post of Panch. Further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 30.06.2023 (Annexure P-3) stated to be pending in the office of respondent No.2.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that petitioner is a resident of Gram Panchayat Nanagwas, Block Mahendergarh, Dist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top