AVNEESH JHINGAN
Manoj Kumar Singhla – Appellant
Versus
Hakim – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the cheque and agreement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court observations on evidentiary burden and legal conclusions. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. final conclusions on the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 6 , 10) |
Judgment
Ms. Amarjot Bhatti, J.
This is an application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal against judgment of acquittal dated 22.09.2021.
2. The facts in brief are that the applicant and the respondent for
starting a business executed an agreement on 21.10.2014 and respondent took an amount of Rs.1,50,000/-, further Rs.1,20,000/- was taken on different dates. For discharging the liability, the respondent issued a cheque bearing No.015080 dated 15.03.2015 for an amount of Rs.2,70,000/-, drawn on Central Bank of India, Ballabgarh, Faridabad. On presentation, the cheque was returned vide memo dated 20.03.2015 with remarks “funds insufficient”. After issuance of notice, on failure of the respondent to pay the amount the complaint was filed.
3. The respondent took a defence that two blank cheques including
the cheque in question were given to the complainant as security in pursuance to the agreement dated 21.10.2014. The reliance was placed upon agre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.