SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1694

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Bhardwaj and Company (M/s) – Appellant
Versus
Sarvesh Kumar Jindal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Sunny K. Singla

Judgment

Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.

The prayer for impounding the agreement to sell on the ground that it is not sufficiently stamped, has been kept open by the trial court. The correctness of the aforesaid order is challenged by the petitioner/defendant by filing the revision petition.

2. In order to comprehend the issue involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed. In 2001, the State of Punjab amended the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. By the said amendment, the agreement to sell evidencing the delivery of possession was included in the definition of the conveyance deed and by amending entry no.23 of the Schedule, the stamp duty was made payable thereon. In substance, the liability to pay the stamp duty was advanced from the date of registration of the sale deed to the date of execution of the agreement to sell. The liability to pay the stamp duty remains the same. Whatever stamp duty is paid at the time of the agreement to sell the same is liable to be adjusted towards the final stamp duty, that is payable at the time of registration. It is in that context that this Court has observed that the only stage of the payment of stamp duty to a certain exte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top