SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1661

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Kirti Singh, Anupinder Singh Grewal, JJ.
Pankaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CRWP No. 11858 of 2023
Decided On : 15-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ishan Sharma, Mr. Anant Kataria DAG, Haryana

Emergency parole may be granted based on family welfare and previous compliance with parole conditions.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 367, 34 - Parole application - Petition for emergency parole granted on grounds of wife's pregnancy, with a history of compliance with previous parole conditions - Petitioner has served 4 years and 4 months of his sentence. (Paras 2, 3, 4, 5)

(B) Emergency Parole - Considerations for granting emergency parole include the welfare of family and the petitioner's previous conduct during parole.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought emergency parole for two months due to his wife's pregnancy, with the expected delivery date of 24.12.2023. He has a daughter aged 11 years and there is no one to assist his wife during this time.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner had previously complied with parole conditions and that his family situation justified the granting of emergency parole.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted emergency parole based on the current family circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that granting emergency parole was in the interest of justice, considering the petitioner's family situation and his compliance with previous parole conditions.

Result: Petition allowed, granting emergency parole for four weeks.

Judgment

Mr. Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.

The petition has been filed for grant of parole for two months to the petitioner on the ground of pregnancy of his wife.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier been granted parole for two months as his wife was at an advanced stage of pregnancy. He had surrendered on 16.11.2023 but the due date of delivery is 24.12.2023. He further submits that the prayer in this petition has erroneously been mentioned as extension of parole but it may be treated as a petition for emergency parole. He also submits that the petitioner, who had been convicted for the commission of an offense punishable under Sections 302, 367, 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, has undergone an actual sentence of 04 years, 04 months & 20 days. The petitioner was involved in another case but he has been acquitted in that case. He besides his wife, has 11 years old daughter and it would be difficult for them to look after the new born child.

3. Learned State Counsel has filed status report by way of an affidavit of Bhupinder Singh, Dy. Superintendent, District Jail, Yamuna Nagar wherein it is stated that it has been verified that there are two members in petitioner’s family including his wife and eleven years old daughter. They are staying separately from the parents of the petitioner. There is nobody to look after the wife of the petitioner. It has also been verified that the wife of the petitioner has been admitted in Deswal Hospital, Opp. Gupta Petrol Pump, Near Dimple Cinema, Yamuna Nagar Road, at Jagadhari and her expected date of delivery is 24.12.2023.

4. The petitioner has undergone an actual sentence of 04 years, 04 months and 20 days. He is stated to have been granted parole on earlier occasion and he did not misuse the concession of parole and had surrendered on time. The petitioner’s wife is at an advance stage of pregnancy and besides her and her 11 years old daughter there is no one to look after the new born child.

5. In view of the above, it would be in interest of justice, if the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to release the petitioner on emergency parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned authority. On the expiry of period of parole of four weeks, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the concerned jail authorities.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top