SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1661

KIRTI SINGH, ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Pankaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ishan Sharma, Mr. Anant Kataria DAG, Haryana

Judgment

Mr. Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.

The petition has been filed for grant of parole for two months to the petitioner on the ground of pregnancy of his wife.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier been granted parole for two months as his wife was at an advanced stage of pregnancy. He had surrendered on 16.11.2023 but the due date of delivery is 24.12.2023. He further submits that the prayer in this petition has erroneously been mentioned as extension of parole but it may be treated as a petition for emergency parole. He also submits that the petitioner, who had been convicted for the commission of an offense punishable under Sections 302, 367, 34 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, has undergone an actual sentence of 04 years, 04 months & 20 days. The petitioner was involved in another case but he has been acquitted in that case. He besides his wife, has 11 years old daughter and it would be difficult for them to look after the new born child.

3. Learned State Counsel has filed status report by way of an affidavit of Bhupinder Singh, Dy. Superintendent, District Jail, Yamuna Nagar wherein it is stated that it has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top