SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 3192

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Jarnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sant Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.S. Swaich

Judgment

Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral):- This appeal has been filed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class while dismissing complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2. Complainant-appellant filed complaint with the averments that he agreed to sell immovable property to the respondent by an oral agreement. Sale deed was to be executed on 13.01.2005 for a total sale consideration of Rs.5,00,000/-. It is claimed by the complainant-appellant that Rs.3,00,000/- was paid in cash, whereas a cheque for Rs.2,00,000/- was issued.

3. Learned Judicial Magistrate on appreciation of evidence has found that Ex.C6, sale deed executed by the appellant does not refer to any payment by cheque. It has been recorded therein that the entire amount has been paid. The endorsement before the Sub-Registrar is also to the same effect. The court has also noticed that the cheque in question was initially self/bearer cheque but it is claimed that the same was endorsed in favour of the appellant subsequently. Once, in the sale deed (registered) there is no reference to the payment of part of sale consideration through cheque, therefore,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top