SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 2164

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Manoj Pundir, Ms. Geeta Sharma DAG, Haryana, Mr. Bhupender Singh

Judgment

Mr. Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. (Oral):- (The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.)

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.146 dated 02.05.2020 registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’) in Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar from which Section 34 of the IPC was deleted lateron.

3. The above-said FIR was registered on complaint of Ravi Kumar. In his complaint Ravi Kumar alleged that around 7-8 years ago marriage of his sister Rajni was solemnized with Sushil Kumar. Two children were born out of the wedlock. Sushil Kumar used to beat his sister under the influence of liquor and continuously tortured her from the beginning. Mother-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law of his sister also harassed her. On 01.05.2020 his sister Rajni ended her life by consuming some poisonous substance.

4. The petitioner, who is in custody since 04.06.2020, has filed the present petition for grant of regular bail.

5. The petition has been opposed by learned State Counsel in terms o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top