SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 2101

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Punjab National Bank Circle Office Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Saurav Verma, Mr. Aakash Soni, Mr. Saurav Goel

Judgment

Mr. Amol Rattan Singh, J.:- By this petition, the petitioner (the Punjab National Bank, Circle Office Ludhiana and the Chief Manager of the Branch at Dhandari Kalan, Ludhiana), challenge the order passed by the 3rd respondent, i.e. the recovery officer of the Employees Provident Fund Organization, Ludhiana, dated 24.05.2019 (copy Annexure P-10), by which in fact the Zonal Manager of the said Bank (petitioner no. 2) has been made liable to pay a sum of Rs. 4,91,263/- on account of dues from M/s R.V. International, Dhandari Kalan, Ludhiana, which firm is stated to be a ‘deemed defaulter’ under the provisions of Section 11 (2) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The salary of the Chief Manager of the Dhandari Kalan Branch of the Bank, has also been ordered to be attached, towards recovery therefrom of the dues.

2. It is to be noticed that the aforesaid ‘deemed defaulter’, has not been impleaded as a respondent in the present petition, with learned counsel for the 1st petitioner having submitted that since the impugned order is only one by which the petitioner Bank and its officer have been held liable to pay the aforesaid sum of money, in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top