JUDGMENT :

Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.:- This revision petition has been filed by the defendant to challenge the correctness of the order permitting his counsel to further cross-examine defendant no.1 and his witnesses.

2. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, some relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed.

3. Originally, the plaintiff’s suit for the grant of decree of declaration to the effect that he is owner to the extent of half share of the suit property was dismissed by the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 07.12.2013. In an appeal filed by the plaintiff, the First Appellate Court remitted the matter back to the trial court with the following observations:-

“15. As a result of the aforesaid discussion, the court is left with no other option but to set aside the findings returned by the ld. Lower court by way of the impugned judgment dated 7.12.2013 in toto. The necessary consequences that follow are:-

1) The civil suit under reference stands revived and remanded to the lower court for fresh adjudication.

2) The court shall proceed to array all the heirs of Gulzar Singh, existing and alive at the time of his death according to Hindu Successi