JUDGMENT :

Arun Palli, J.

A brief narration of facts that have led the parties to the current stage would be imperative.

2. Pursuant to a re-allotment letter dated 21.01.2004 (P-1), Arun Kumar Goyal-respondent No.2 (allottee) was allotted an industrial plot No. 118, Industrial Area, Phase-I, Panchkula. And per condition No.21 thereof, production, in terms of the approved project, was required to be commenced within six months. For the survey branch reported that the allottee had failed to commission the unit, he was served with a notice of resumption dated 02.12.2004, under Section 17(3) of the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act , 1977 (the Act). And eventually, for neither the site was fully constructed nor the production commenced, vide order dated 30.01.2006 (P-5), the Estate Officer, under Section 17(4) of the Act, ordered resumption of site and the building constructed thereon. Further, 10% of the consideration amount and other dues, payable up to the date of resumption, were forfeited. The said order was assailed by the allottee in appeal under Section 17(5) of the Act. However, the Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula, (Appellate Authority), vide order dated 19.12.2014, dismisse