SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Sikk) 10

M.SENGUPTA
CHANDRA PRAKASH GURUNG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF SIKKIM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.ROY, J.B.Pradhan, S.P.WANGDI

MALAY SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IT is a Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE case of the Petitioner is that he was initially appointed as a trained Graduate teacher in a Government School on 22. 8. 1978. He acquired sufficient experience and underwent various trainings sponsored by the Government. On 18. 6. 1983 he joined in a post of Coordinator and Obtained Post graduate Degree. The scale and status of the coordinator is of the Lowest Gazetted. Initially the scale was Rs. 660. 00 to 1400. 00 and it was revised to Rs. 1820. 00 to 3200. 00. The Petitioner was confirmed in the post of coordinator by a Government Notification dated 4. 8. 1983. Though the Petitioner was holding the post of Coordinator, it has been alleged that he was not given the scale prescribed for the lowest gazetted officers inspite of repeated representations and demands made in this respect. It has been contended that in the past many graduate teachers appointed as coordinator were given the lowest gazetted scale either initially or within a year or two, the Petitioner cited a few examples where teachers joining as Coordinators long after the date of joining of the Petitioner as Coordinat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top