SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Sikk) 7

RIPUSUDAN DAYAL
SANTOSH BARDEWA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF SIKKIM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.SANYAL, J.B.Pradhan, MANOJ CHATTERJI, S.P.WANGDI

RIPUSUDAN DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, S K Bardewa, was a permanent member of Sikkim State Civil Service and was working as Additional Secretary, Programme Implementation and Evaluation Department when disci phnary proceedings were initiated against him vide Memo No 538/gen/dop dated 5-6-1996 on the charge that while serving as Deputy Director, Information and Public Relation Department, Government of Sikkim he applied for and secured a loan of Rs 2 lakhs from the Sikkim Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd , (SID1co) Gangtok in his capacity as proprietor of M/s Himalchuh Hotel, Development Area and engaged himself directly in Trade and Business in violation of rule 16 of Sikkim Govt Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1981 Enquiry was conducted by Shri M. K. Pradhan who submitted his report on 24-1-1997 Annexure P-7 It appears from the report that no oral evidence was produced before the Enquiry Officer and he gave his findings on the basis of the documents placed before him He recorded the following findings (I) The petitioner had applied for loan for construciton of a hotel in the name of Himalchuh in Development Area after completing due formalities as per SIDICO requ







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top