HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
RIPUSUDAN DAYAL
PURAN TIRWA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF SIKKIM - Respondents
CRIMINAL APPEAL 10 Of 2001
Decided On : MAY 28, 2002
Benefit of Doubt - Acquittal - The court held that it would be unsafe to rely upon the evidence produced by the prosecution, and therefore, the appellants were entitled to the benefit of doubt, resulting in their acquittal under section 366/376 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Fact of the Case:
The court found it unsafe to rely upon the evidence produced by the prosecution, leading to the appellants' entitlement to the benefit of doubt and acquittal.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed all three appeals, set aside the judgment and order of the learned trial court, and acquitted the appellants of the offences under section 366/376 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants were in custody and were ordered to be set at liberty forthwith.
Issues: Reliability of evidence produced by the prosecution, entitlement to the benefit of doubt, and acquittal of the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the unsafe reliance on the prosecution's evidence, leading to the appellants' entitlement to the benefit of doubt and subsequent acquittal.
Final Decision: The court allowed all three appeals, set aside the judgment and order of the learned trial court, and acquitted the appellants of the offences under section 366/376 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants were ordered to be set at liberty forthwith.
( 1 ) ALL these appeals challenge the judgment and order of the learned sessions judge, east and north, sikkim at gangtok convicting them under sections 366 and 376 read with section 34 of indian penal code, and sentencing each of them under section 376 with rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and a fine of rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months and under section 366 of indian penal code to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and a fine of rs. 1000/- and in case of default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. Substantive sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.
( 2 ) ALL the appellants and one sukbir tamang are taxi drivers and stood trial before the sessions judge in criminal case no. 15 of 1998. However, before the case could be decided by the learned sessions judge, sukbir tamang absconded. The victim is ms. Luki subba who is a resident of makha. Prosecution case is that on 22nd july, 1998, the victim ms. Luki subba dame from her house at makha t6 the house of her aunty (phupu) at singtam bazar and while she was returning from singtam bazar to her home, all the appellants and sukbir tamang stopped their vehicle and offered to take her towards makha. The victim told them that she did not have the passenger fare and would, therefore, prefer to walk. But the four accused persons gave the victim girl a free lift. When they reached near kali khola, they stopped the vehicle on the pretext of washing it and also closed the hood. Then appellant puran tirwa came inside the vehicle and pulled out her clothes and forcibly committed sexual intercourse with her. All her attempts to resist failed, as, the other accused persons held her hands and feet when the appellant puran tirwa committed forcibly sexual intercourse with her. Thereafter, she managed to escape and ran towards manpari busty. After she had just crossed over the bridge towards manpari busty, appellant puran tirwa took her inside the tata truck forcibly and when she tried to scream, he closed her mouth with his palm. Thereafter, the accused persons drove her further and on reaching near the military camp, the tata truck stopped and there puran tirwa again committed sexual intercourse with her forcibly. Then accused sukbir tamang, who later absconded came and forcibly laid her on the second seat of the tata truck and committed sexual intercourse with her. When she tried to resist, the other persons held her by her hands and feet. Thereafter, the driver of the vehicle, namely. Man bahadur tamang, called her to the front seat and outraged her modesty. After sometime, the victim asked the driver to stop the tata truck, as she wanted to urinate. The driver stopped the truck and then she got down and went a little further where she pretended to urinate. In the meantime, one gypsy vehicle came and the victim stopped that vehicle and made a request for a lift and she was offered the lift by the owner of the vehicle who happened to be her phupa (father's sister's husband ). Then she got into the gypsy vehicle and spent the night in the house of her phupa. On the next day, that is, 23rd july, 1998, til bahadur subba, p. W. 2, the father of the victim made a complaint to the officer-in-charge, singtarn police station to the effect that his daughter luki subba had gone to her aunty at singtam, and when she was returning home after having failed to meet her aunty, the appellant puran tirwa and three boys told her that their vehicle would go to makha and deceitfully took her in their vehicle and forcefully raped her on the way. The fir was scribed by nilakantha rai, c. W. 5. According to the prosecution, the victim was aged less than 16 years at the relevant time. She was medically examined on 23rd july, 1998 by medical officer, singtam district hospital dr. Manoj kumar sarda, p. W. 10, who reported in his report exhibit 3 as under :
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.