SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 94

TARUN AGARWALA
ASHWANI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
VIDYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.RAJVANSHI, N.C.RAJVANSHI, Sagar Singh, V.K.Mishra

( 1 ) HEARD Shr. Shiv Sagar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant and sr. N. C. Rajvanshi, the learned Senior counsel for the respondents.

( 2 ) THE suit was dismissed by the trial court. The plaintiff filed an appeal and during its pendency, the plaintiff died. The applicant filed an application to substitute himself as the legal heir of the deceased on the ground that he is the adopted son of the plaintiff by virtue of a registered adoption deed dated 31 -1 -1984. The defendants filed their objections. The lower Appellant Court, after considering the matter, rejected the application on the ground that the adoption deed had not been validly executed and simultaneously dismissed the appeal as abated. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present application under Article 227 of the constitution of India.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the respondents Sr. N. C. Rajvanshi raised preliminary objection that the application under article 227 of the Constitution of India was not maintainable, inasmuch as the impugned order was a decree within the meaning of Section 2 (2) of the C. P. C. , and therefore, only an appeal would lie against the said order under Section 100 of the C. P. C.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top