SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 1627

VINOD PRASAD
VINEET KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Arora, S.Mahipal Singh, S.Shahnawaj Shah, Sudhir Kumar

( 1 ) VINEET Kumar the revisionist is aggrieved by the two orders of even date 19-12-2003 passed by II Additional Sessions judge, (Court No. 5) Bijnor in Criminal Misc. Application No. 8 of 2003 State v. Amit kumar, declaring the accused respondent no. 2 Amit Kumar to be a juvenile under section 14 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and protection of Children) Act, 2000 and granting him bail in S. T. No. 337 of 2002 u/ss. 302, 34, 504, 506, IPC, P. S. Kotwali, Dehat district Bijnor vide his Bail Application No. 1421 of 2003, Amit Kumar v. State, for the said offences.

( 2 ) PRELUDE to the whole proceedings lies in a FIR (Annexure No. 1) lodged by the revisonist vineet Kumar on 4-4-2002 at 11. 15 a. m. in respect of the murder of his brother vinay Kumar alias Neetu, by spade on the same day at about 9. 30 a. m. by accused amit Kumar respondent No. 2 along with brijesh and Baljor as his socio criminises. The FIR of the revisionist was registered as crime No. 116 of 2002 u/ss. 302/504/506, ipc at P. S. Kotwali Dehat, district Bijnor. Amit Kumar respondent No. 2 was arrested and put in jail. To seek his release he moved his bail application before the Sessions judge, Bijnor but the same was







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top