SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R. K. RASTOGI
MANOJ KUMAR SWAMI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. - Respondents
Cri. Misc. Appln 1591 Of 2006
Decided On : 02/10/2006

Advocates Appeared:
Anil Raghav, S.P.SINGH RAGHAV

Accused's right to summon relevant evidence for defense at the stage of defense.

Headnote:

Summoning of Record - Criminal Procedure Code - The accused has the right to summon any evidence relevant for proper appreciation of the prosecution evidence and to substantiate his defense. In this case, the court allowed the application to summon the relevant record to ascertain the educational background of the deceased, as it was deemed relevant for the defense.

Fact of the Case:

The accused were facing trial under sections 498-A and 304-B I. P. C. The accused moved an application to summon the record of a school to ascertain the educational background of the deceased, based on her dying declaration.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that at the stage of defense, the accused has the right to summon any evidence relevant for proper appreciation of the prosecution evidence and to substantiate his defense. Considering the allegation that the deceased was uneducated but had given a statement about passing High School examination, the court allowed the application to summon the relevant record.

Issues: The issue was whether the accused had the right to summon the relevant record to ascertain the educational background of the deceased at the stage of defense.

Ratio Decidendi: The accused has the right to summon any evidence relevant for proper appreciation of the prosecution evidence and to substantiate his defense at the stage of defense.

Final Decision: The application to summon the relevant record was allowed, and the Addl. Sessions Judge was directed to summon the record to ascertain the fact whether the deceased had actually passed High school examination or not.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under section 482 Cr. P. C. for quashing the order dated 18-1-2006 passed by the Addl. Sessions judge-VIth, Ghaziabad in S. T. no. 68 of 2001, State Vs. Manoj Swami and others, under sections 498-A, 304-B I. P. C. of police station Sihani Gate, Ghaziabad.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for disposal of this application arc that the applicants, Manoj and other co-accused persons are facing trial under sections 498-A and 304-B I. P. C. in the aforesaid case. It appears from perusal of the order of the learned Addl. Sessions judge that the prosecution evidence has been recorded and the case is fixed for defence evidence. The accused have moved an application for summoning the record of kanya Vidyalaya Khurja for tenth class pertaining to the years from 1997 to 1999. Their allegation is that the deceased Shashi had stated in her dying declaration that she had passed High School examination from the aforesaid school three years ago. This statement was given by her on 8-9-2000. The applicants allegation is that she was an uneducated lady and had not studied in any school. So in view of the statement made in the dying declaration he wants to summon the record of the said school. The learned sessions Judge rejected the above application on the ground that the dying declaration was recorded by the S. D. M. and so there was no necessity to summon the above record.

( 3 ) HAVING heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned A. G. A. for the State, I am of the view that the case is listed for defence evidence and at the stage of defence the accused has a right to summon any evidence which may be relevant for proper appreciation of the prosecution evidence and to substantiate his defence.

( 4 ) TAKING into cpnsideration the allegation of the applicant that the deceased was an uneducated lady but she had given statement that she had passed High School examination it is in the interest of justice that the application of the applicant to summon the relevant record to ascertain this fact whether she had passed High School examination or not should have been granted by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge. The application, therefore, deserves to be allowed.

( 5 ) THE application is allowed and the Addl. Sessions Judge is directed to summon the relevant record to ascertain the fact whether the deceased had actually passed High school examination or not. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on 25-2-2006. Application allowed.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top